U.S. quietly declassifies Cold–War era ‘JUMPSEAT’ surveillance satellites
The National Reconnaissance Office has now declassified a satellite program used to spy on America’s adversaries
National Reconnaissance Office
Some forty years ago, the U.S. launched a series of secret satellites, designed to spy on the country’s adversaries.
Launched between March 1971 and February 1987, those satellite missions, nicknamed “JUMPSEAT,” were declassified by the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO).
The NRO and the U.S. Airforce developed the satellites together to boost the U.S. government’s “space intelligence portfolio,” with a view to monitoring “adversarial offensive and defensive weapon system development,” according to the NRO. It’s unclear what, exactly, the JUMPSEAT satellites were monitoring.
On supporting science journalism
If you’re enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
“The historical significance of JUMPSEAT cannot be understated,” said James Outzen, NRO director of the Center for the Study of National Reconnaissance, in the same statement. “Its orbit provided the U.S. a new vantage point for the collection of unique and critical signals intelligence from space.”
National Reconnaissance Office
The first JUMPSEAT mission launched in 1971 from a military base near Santa Barbara, California, and provided information to the U.S. Department of Defense and the National Security Agency, among other national security bodies.
According to a December memo signed by the NRO director Christopher Scolese, the JUMPSEAT satellites performed “admirably,” but were decommissioned in 2006. Declassifying the missions, he said, would pose little risk to “current and future satellite systems.”
More detailed information about what the satellites did may be coming in future. “After limited declassification,” Scolese wrote in the memo, “we will evaluate the program for a more complete programmatic declassification as time and resources permit.”
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can’t-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world’s best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.
There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.
